This morning at the beginning of His Kharej Fiqh, His holiness referred to the statement of 38 of so called Salafi Ulama of Saudi Arabia about the necessity of killing Shiite and called it a crime, and expressed surprise for silence of international associations in this regard.
His holiness said: International associations have kept silent against the crime of issuance of order for slaughter by some so called Ulama, but they blustered widely for a political murder in Lebanon. We too condemn the political murder, but is there any justification for the order of millions of people resisting against Zionists?
His holiness added: What has Foreign Ministry done for this? The government of Saudi Arabia has said that they are not related to us and we are against them, but in which schools and by whose cost these Salafi Ulama are taught?
Stating that the order for killing of Shiite is not limited to Iraq, His holiness said: Objection to this does not indicate intervention in the local issues of Iraq. Our relations with other countries shall be based on honor and we shall not let such behaviors.
His holiness added: In the fair recently hold in Khartoum, the books about doctrine of Prophet’s Household (a.s.) were publicly received well. However, some Wahhabite threatened the government, and Sudan closed the booths. What is the position of Foreign Ministry in this regard. Why they say that our relations are based on the friendship and compromise. Iran is a powerful country, and friendship does not imply silence against inappropriate and unseemly attitude with us.
He continued: They have employed some illiterate Persian speaking individuals to insult the Iranian pilgrims. Is abusing and cursing a method of hospitality? The people say why Maraj’ do not object this. All of us are responsible. We shall object rightfully and shall not let them to insult us.
At the end, His holiness expressed: We display the greatest case of defending Islam against Israel. Hezbollah in Lebanon belongs to us. We shall object. Otherwise, the next generations will object us that the present limitation of doctrine of Prophet’s Household (a.s.) is the result of your silence.